Home
Design Patent of the week Product Design Of the week Litigation Legislation Design Practice Links
posted 10:04 AM by Unknown

This is a test posting by Ross Dannenberg on June 10, 2009.

Whoever marks upon, or affixes to, or uses in advertising in connection with any unpatented article the word "patent" or any word or number importing the same is patented, for the purpose of deceiving the public; or Whoever marks upon, or affixes to, or uses in advertising in connection with any article the words "patent applied for," "patent pending," or any word importing that an application for patent has been made, when no application for patent has been made, or if made, is not pending, for the purpose of deceiving the public - Shall be fined not more than $500 for every such offense.
This is a test posting by Ross Dannenberg on June 10, 2009.This is a test posting by Ross Dannenberg on June 10, 2009.This is a test posting by Ross Dannenberg on June 10, 2009.This is a test posting by Ross Dannenberg on June 10, 2009.This is a test posting by Ross Dannenberg on June 10, 2009.
posted 5:26 PM by Anthony D Paul
I'm short on time today, but Bloomberg reported a new lawsuit filed by Taser against Second Life (via its parent Linden Research Inc.). No sense in recreating the wheel, and Virtual World News has already posted a nice intro to the case here. 

The case is Taser Interntional v. Linden Research in the District Court for Arizona, case 2:09-cv-00811-ROS, filed April 17, 2009.

We'll monitor developments and keep you posted.

Search

Loading